Hoffmann + Krippner - 3D printing components

Series production in 3D printing: Can additive manufacturing keep up with injection molding?

High-quality plastic parts in the flexible 3D printing process as a fast, cost-effective alternative to the costly but established injection molding process: So-called rapid prototyping is now used not only for prototypes, but increasingly also for the realization of medium and small series. So a lot has happened in recent years in the development of this innovative additive manufacturing technology in conjunction with CNC-controlled machines – rapid prototyping is recognized as a production technology. But can it really compete with classic manufacturing processes like injection molding when it comes to size, accuracy, reliability and repeatability? Or put another way: When does it make sense to replace injection molding with additive manufacturing?

3D printing: advantages and potential

3D printing does not require costly and time-consuming tooling: The same device can be used to create virtually any number of different geometries. In the resulting physical models, errors and inaccuracies can be easily and quickly detected. The so-called trial-and-error process is therefore more time-saving, cost-effective and uncomplicated with the help of 3D printing. And last but not least, there is considerably less waste that would be generated by other manufacturing processes such as milling, turning or grinding. This protects the environment, saves resources and eases the burden on budgets.

With the additive manufacturing process, our customers not only save weight and costs in the long term during the production of various devices and components: we can also react quickly to changing requirements during the ongoing production process, order according to the situation and thus avoid costly warehousing. Rapid prototyping enables us to produce high-precision prototypes directly from existing CAD data – faster than ever before. And these prototypes don’t just look like the final products – they work like them, too. Design and function can be optimized quickly and easily in this way.

In the case of injection molded parts, these flexible options are not available because the complete injection mold has to be modified or even rebuilt at high cost. In the additive manufacturing process, on the other hand, the data record is simply changed and the changes are entered in the next batch – and that’s it. Even better, the parts price remains the same.

"A modern smartphone in electric blue that serves as a portable communication device. The device features a shock-resistant bumper and combines telephony functions with modern technology."
3D printed handheld housing with recess for the integration of a membrane keyboard
"A rectangular gadget for vehicle lighting on a bumper, surrounded by gas, multimedia technology and other car parts. A modern fashion accessory for machine lovers and technology enthusiasts."
3D printed IoT gateway enclosure with board mounting, threads, cable holder, and more.
Capacitive foil sensor installed in product
3D printed and black colored housing for a capacitive control system

Rapid Prototyping: Challenges

In addition to all the undeniable benefits, however, there are some elementary challenges to rapid prototyping technology:

  • Components still have to be reworked, which is time-consuming and relatively unautomated
  • Currently still limited choice of materials for certain 3D printing processes
  • Currently, no smooth surfaces can be achieved as in injection molding

There are also the challenges of process repeatability and reliability of the printing process. A particularly high quality standard is required here, which not all providers are yet able to implement validly in order to keep up with conventional processes. Reducing overall production costs is not only a goal for small batches and prototypes, but also for large-scale production.

Industrial series production with additive manufacturing technologies, even for larger quantities, requires independent design strategies for components in order to keep pace with conventional methods. Our experts at H+K have such strategies and implement them individually depending on the project. This makes us one of the few service providers so far to have developed reliable solutions for overcoming all the challenges just mentioned and making rapid prototyping a genuine production alternative.

Conclusion: Rapid Prototyping as an Ideal Complement to Conventional Manufacturing Technologies

Let’s return to the initial question: Can rapid prototyping keep up with injection molding? The answer – as often in life – is a clear “It depends!”: Because rapid prototyping is not equally the holy grail of production for all applications: Above all, conventional processes such as injection molding continue to be the best solution for high volumes in the high-volume and mass production sector. There, additive technologies will never replace all conventional technologies. However, when it comes to areas where small quantities, a high degree of individualization or particularly complicated geometries are required, additive manufacturing processes definitely come into their own – as an optimal alternative or even supplement to the tried-and-tested processes. The more this technology develops in the coming years, the higher the quantities that can be produced with its use will be.

High potentials exist here in many industries: In healthcare, aerospace, transportation, motorsports and more. This is where rapid prototyping plays out the advantages that make it one of the most exciting technologies at the moment:

  • Short manufacturing time: only a few days to prototype
  • Sustainability: less material waste
  • Individualization: fast adaptation of the 3D data
  • On Demand Order: short-term + flexible production
  • Implementation of lightweight structures: a wide range of possibilities
  • Low manufacturing costs: no high tooling costs
  • Freely scalable: complex geometries possible
  • Efficient test methodology: cost-effective, fast test printing

Additive manufacturing therefore always makes sense when (geometrically complex) components are required in smaller quantities. And if these cannot be produced conventionally, or only at great expense. Furthermore, rapid prototyping can enhance standard components with additional functions. However, if components have already been optimized for a long time and can be produced economically in large quantities by conventional means, conventional production, for example via injection molding, remains the most sensible solution.

The Multi Jet Fusion process

Hoffmann + Krippner HP Multi Jet Fusion Process for 3D Printing
HP Multi Jet Fusion 3D Printer

We rely on HP’s powder-based Multi Jet Fusion process for 3D printing. This additive manufacturing process is suitable for prototypes, functional components and series products with high-quality surfaces and the finest attention to detail.

Advantages of the MJF process:

  • Waterproof, UV and weather resistant
  • No support structures necessary
  • Almost isotropic material behavior
  • Very high detail accuracy, print resolution of 1,200 dpi
  • Dimensional accuracy according to DIN 16742 TG6 NW
  • High density of parts and low porosity
  • High printing speed, 2 – 3 cm printing height per hour
Insight into Additive Manufacturing Whitepaper

Get our whitepaper on additive manufacturing as the perfect complement to conventional manufacturing technologies now.

Hoffmann + Krippner - Jens Arend

Jens Arend
Technical Sales + Product Development – Design & Conception

+ 49 +49 69 82 37 247 0

Note on file naming

To ensure that your files can be transferred and processed by us without any problems, please observe the following instructions:

  1. Avoid spaces: Use underscores (_) or hyphens (-) instead of spaces.
  2. Use dots sparingly: There should be no dots in the name except before the file extension (e.g. .jpg).
  3. Avoid special characters: Characters like &, %, $ and # can cause errors.

Thank you for your understanding.